|
The Papers. What are they?
Ostensibly they are a group of
papers that purport to introduce humanity to "religion of the
spirit"--in contrast to the "religions of authority"
as presently practiced by mankind.
The remarkable thing about
these Papers is that many who study them have concluded that:
"If they are not true then surely they ought to be."
Others have been impressed by the extraordinary quality of the
thoughts they present, typically remarking that, "no human
being has ever written like this," or that the ethics,
aesthetics and concepts of deity they present are, "out of this
world"--and way beyond the capacity of any previous authors.
So regardless of the
conclusions an individual may make about the Papers' authorship, or
how narrow that individual's religious (or non-religious) beliefs
may be, there is probably no human being on earth who could not gain
some benefit from studying them seriously.
However the pace of modern
life is such that many believe they have no time available to
indulge themselves with a single 2000-page book. Hence this
condensed version of key information from the Papers is reduced by
about 100-fold so that those so pressed for time might know that
there is much more to life and living than material gain or fame.
Who wrote them and why?
Their authors offer these
Papers as if they are being presented by celestial beings having a
charter to present a detailed account, comprehensible to finite
beings with our level of knowledge and intellect, that includes the
reasons for our existence, and details of our universe careers that
would eventually reach its climax with our "attaining" of
the Universal Father in Paradise, plus a description of the
celestial environment and the spirit beings we would meet during our
pilgrim journey.
Undoubtedly this would be a
difficult task but one made more difficult by the necessity to
comply with universe rules on revelation that includes the
proscription against provision of any unearned knowledge.
Nevertheless the authors were still required to offer a unified
concept framework by which ordinary mortals might comprehend their
now-commencing universe career that includes their graduation to
spirit life and their journey to Paradise.
Imagine being instructed, in
the early part of the last century, to provide a native population
from the mountains of New Guinea or from the deep forests of the
Amazon with a comprehensible understanding of the operation of the
New York stock exchange and how it works, but with a strict ban on
presenting any "unearned knowledge!" That would appear to
be a reasonable analogy with what faced the Urantia Papers' authors.
The Papers first began to make
their presence known in the 1910 to 1934 period. Because of the
mandate requirements, much of the cosmology they provided is now
outdated. However the mandate also provided for the premature
release of vital missing information and, indeed, some of the
cosmology was highly prophetic when offered--and some still is. One
of the effects of this prophetic material was to generate
fundamentalism among many readers, but also confusion because of the
soon appearing outdatedness of some of their cosmology.
The apparently unnecessary
inclusion of "soon to be outdated" material may also have
been virtually unavoidable in order to comply with other strict
rules concerning human free will, as discussed below.
According to the Papers, our
present life is preparatory. Ideally we progress from what is
essentially a nature that is dominated by inherited, animal-origin
instincts specifically adapted to a "survival of the
fittest" environment, to one that sets aside these primitive
instincts in undertaking an idealistic spiritual type of life
offered to God in conformity to his will. Ideally it is a life for
soul building in which material values are slowly replaced by those
having spiritual value. Nothing material or purely of material value
participates in soul building. Neither do such values pass on with
the soul to the next phase of our universe career. Experiences,
beliefs, thoughts, events, actions, or whatever it is that
constitutes our life must have genuine spiritual value in order to
participate in the building of our souls.
The limitations imposed by
human free will.
The Papers state that God has
decreed the absolute sovereignty of human free will. Our entry into
God's "kingdom" is to be had "only by believing, by
simple and sincere faith."
Human societies operate on the
principle of reward and punishment, reward for doing
"right;" punishment for doing "wrong." Human
religions have embraced this principle, even transferring the
concept onto their anthropomorphic Gods who become both our judges
and executioners.
Taken to a logical extreme,
and so as not to violate the sovereignty of human free will, a decision
to seek to "become one with the Father" and "to
always seek to do God's will" must be one that is undertaken in
the complete absence of duress. It must be a faith decision made
without fear of punishment or the expectation of special reward. At
this level of the freedom of our will, even the decisive proof of
the existence of God would contravene the absolute sovereignty of
that free will--for if we have certain knowledge of an all-powerful
Creator, then surely we must ponder upon what such a Creator might
requires from us--which automatically places us under some duress.
To
understand this more deeply, test yourself sincerely with this
question, "Would I still want to choose to live in God's way,
as it was revealed in the life of Jesus of Nazareth, if decisive
proof was put before me that there is no God?" If your answer
is no, you may need to question whether your real motives are of an
animalistic nature, whereas a yes answer indicates that God's way
really has become your preferred option.
Another
point that needs to be understood is that a true faith decision can
only be made if there is some degree of uncertainty. The moment we
have reason to believe, the moment we have empirical certainty,
belief becomes logic, and no longer faith.
To
comprehend why the Urantia Papers have been presented in such a
strange manner, it does seem necessary to contemplate these
apparently extreme attitudes of the consequences of God's decree of
the absolute sovereignty of our free will.
Examples
of this strangeness is the placing of the authors' mandate halfway
through the Papers, long after many readers would be likely to
reject them either because of errors discovered in their cosmology
or because of the way they blithely present as historical, material
that is probably parable, myth, or allegory that is being used to
convey deeper meaning. But another reason for their strangeness may
be that they have been written so as to be presentable to a vast
range of intellectual awareness among their potential readers.
|