|
Well actually,
you probably wouldn't want to visit a black hole in the first place,
considering the conditions that exist in their vicinity. I wrote
about black holes before but at that time I doubted their existence,
but I was in good company. Albert Einstein once wrote a paper
explaining why black holes couldn't exist. (1) It is especially
ironic that he rejected the idea of black holes, since it was his
theoretical work that suggested to other physicists the possible
existence of black holes. But recently I have parted company with
Albert regarding black holes, based on the evidence that astronomers
have discovered in the past few years.
A black hole is a
body so dense with a gravitational field so intense that at a
particular distance from it nothing, not even light, can escape from
its grasp when it passes this close to the black hole. During
the life of a star, energies created by the process of fusion of
hydrogen to helium generate enough outward pressure to overcome the
force of gravity and prevent the star from collapsing. (460, 465)
When the star has burned most of its fuel and can no longer maintain
the balancing pressure, the star collapses. The remnant may be one
of three things. If the collapse is gradual, the star may end up as
a very dense, small star known as a white dwarf. Since some
internal fusion continues the white dwarf does not collapse. This
star is thought to end its active life as a black dwarf, a dead star
after its fuel is totally expended. This is what some of the dark
islands of space are according to The Urantia Book. (170)
Chandrasekhar
calculated that a white dwarf star cannot exceed the Chandrasekhar
limit of 1.4 solar masses. Stars larger than this apparently blow
off a great deal of matter in a supernova when they no longer have
enough internal pressure to avoid collapse. The remnant of this
process is thought to be what is known as a neutron star. As the
name suggests, the star consists entirely of neutrons, and is as
much as 100 million times denser than a white dwarf. The total
collapse of a neutron star is prevented by a phenomenon known as
degeneracy pressure. A neutron star emits very little visible light,
so they are generally detected by the pulses of radio energy they
emit or their gravitational effects on a companion star in a binary
system. This type of star is known as a pulsar. The third
possibility for the end of life of a star is a black hole.
If a star is
above about three solar masses, when it reaches the end of its life
and collapses, the supernova remnant may be too massive to be
stabilized by degeneracy pressure, and may collapse past the neutron
star stage.(2) When the collapsing star reaches a certain diameter,
its gravitational field becomes so intense that whatever is closer
to the star than a certain distance-known as the Schwartzchild
radius (1) or event horizon-can never escape from the star's
gravitational grasp. A logical question, and one that has bothered
many theorists is: Does the star continue to contract to an
infinitesimal point, known as a singularity? This would mean that
the star would be squeezed to such an extent that even basic
particles like electrons couldn't exist. Under these conditions, the
black hole would consist of the simplest particles possible,
identified by the Urantia Book as ultimatons. However, the
book tells us that ultimatons are unaffected by gravitational
fields (465), and therefore they could leak out of the black
hole, thus reducing its mass before it had contracted to a
singularity. Physicist Stephen Hawking proposed a different
mechanism whereby particles could escape from a black hole, thus
eventually evaporating it. Physicists early proposed that the black
hole would not contract to a singularity, at least in our time frame
of reference. Since time and space are severely warped in the volume
close to the surface of the black hole, all events occurring there,
including the star's contraction, would appear to take a very long
time, much longer than the present age of the universe to occur. In
fact, black holes were referred to as "frozen stars"
before they were called black holes.
|
|
next
column> |
|
|
Astronomers also
have seen evidence of black holes at the center of many galaxies.
(3) The centers of these suspect galaxies show one or more large
jets of gas emitted from the center of the galaxy at right angles to
the galactic plane. The astronomers feel that the gas jets are
effects caused by the black hole. Another indication of black
holes is a rapidly whirling ring of material surrounding whatever is
at the center of these galaxies. This whirling ring of gas and
dust is also seen around the dark companion of some dual stars. The
intense gravity of the black hole strips material from its visible
companion, or companions in the case of a black hole in the center
of a galaxy. As the material moves closer to the black hole, it is
compressed and heated and gives off X-rays. These X-rays have been
detected by several X-ray telescope satellites in the past few
decades. The speed of the gas spiraling in toward the black hole can
be determined by measuring its Doppler shift on either side of the
black hole. The Doppler shift is the change in the frequency of the
light given off by the spiraling ring material due to its motion
towards us or away from us. The speed of this material and the
apparent size of what it is orbiting gives us an idea of the mass
and the volume it occupies. Though the size of some of the objects
at the center of the galaxies is astronomically small, the
calculated masses are as high as several million suns. (3) An
object this dense could hardly be anything but a black hole.
I have been asked
before if black holes are mentioned in The Urantia Book.
Specifically, are the dark bodies around Havona or the dark islands
mentioned in the book, black holes? We can decide quite easily about
the dark bodies. On page 153 the authors tell us that these bodies
"...neither reflect nor absorb light..." Black holes don't
reflect light, but they certainly do absorb it. In the book, the
dark islands of space are defined as: "..the dead suns and
other large aggregations of matter devoid of heat and light."
They go on to mention:
"The
density of some of these large masses is well-nigh
unbelievable." Black holes, neutron stars, and burned out white
dwarfs (black dwarfs) could all fit this description, so all could
be candidates. Another fact the authors give us is that the dark
islands are "vast dynamos" that can "...mobilize and
directionalize these energies." They tell us that Supreme Power
Centers use the dark islands to control the flow of energy in the
local universe. The black dwarfs and neutron stars both could
perform in this role, but since nothing can escape from the gravity
grasp of a black hole, how could it be used to control energy? And
if it is a dead star, how could it be a "vast dynamo"?
The
authors of The Urantia Book tell us that there are numerous higher
forms of energy with which we mortals are not familiar. One we
are familiar with is electromagnetic radiation, especially in its
visual form, light. When the authors speak of dark islands
directionalizing energies, perhaps they are referring to the higher
energy forms which either don't respond to gravity, or respond
differently than light. If so, then perhaps black holes can be used
to control energy; perhaps they are vast dynamos for some of the
higher forms of energy. We can't exclude black holes as being dark
islands, but the black dwarfs and neutron stars seem like more
likely candidates to me.
Perhaps
we'll have to wait till we get to the mansion worlds to get an
answer regarding black holes and the dark islands of space. Till
then we can amuse ourselves with endless speculation, unless of
course we find a dark island orbiting our sun that we can study, and
discover those higher forms of energy that we are ignorant of now.
Maybe in a few millennia...
|
|
|
Dick Bain.
|
|
|
References:
(1)
Jeremy Bernstein, "The Father of Black Holes," Scientific
American, July, 1996
(2)
Groilers Multimedia Encyclopedia 1994, "Supernova"
(3)
Ford and Tsvetanov, "Massive Black Holes in the Hearts of
Galaxies," Sky and Telescope, June 1996.
|
|
< return
to Sciences and Cosmology
|
|